重囗另类BBWSeⅹHD,av狼论坛,精品一卡2卡三卡4卡乱码理论,体育生gv老师浪小辉3p警察

法律類文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

時間:2023-05-04 17:45:46 考研英語 我要投稿
  • 相關推薦

法律類文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

7 A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

法律類文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

  Behind the brewing war over protecting patients' records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.

  Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for genetic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that's good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the tidings can be all bad.

  Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients' bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning in 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, "an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records."

  While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was "health-care operations." That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by "busines

【法律類文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY】相關文章:

Privacy of Famous People06-05

To be,or not to be,that is the question:的翻譯05-02

如何撰寫教育教學類文章04-28

怎樣撰寫“解題指導”類的文章04-30

法律類社會實踐報告12-10

學會用法律保護自己文章12-30

淺談生活情感類文章的技巧指導05-01

自然科學類文章閱讀淺談04-30

介紹我的法律類自學考試經驗04-29

作文 議論類的文章應當以論點為宜04-24

主站蜘蛛池模板: 托里县| 浙江省| 凤山市| 丽江市| 和平县| 乌兰浩特市| 晋江市| 桃江县| 邵阳市| 钦州市| 黄大仙区| 牙克石市| 双辽市| 通化县| 吴忠市| 平凉市| 社旗县| 南康市| 双辽市| 云南省| 安陆市| 福安市| 巴彦淖尔市| 义乌市| 克拉玛依市| 曲松县| 莱西市| 五寨县| 黔南| 大关县| 齐齐哈尔市| 澜沧| 南靖县| 开江县| 苏尼特左旗| 资中县| 海伦市| 甘孜| 金坛市| 洪江市| 满洲里市|